Showing posts with label Liverpool. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Liverpool. Show all posts

Thursday, 6 July 2017

The Corbyn surge is continuing at the Labour grassroots level


The Jeremy Corbyn surge is continuing at the local Labour Party grassroots level with pro-Corbyn candidates winning democratic internal Labour Party elections all over the place, causing right-wingers from inside and outside the Labour Party to absolutely lose their minds over it.

The latest example is the Liverpool Wavertree branch of the Labour Party in which 9 out of 10 positions on the Executive Committee just went to Momentum-backed candidates in the elections, after which a single member of the Executive Committee said that they support the local MP Luciana Berger, but she should be answerable to the concerns of local Labour Party members if she ever decides to do anything else like vote to bomb Syria, or support another vote of no confidence against the party leader at the most damaging time imaginable for the party.

On the face of it this is bad news for Luciana Berger because she was one of the Labour Party cabinet members who participated in the spectacularly failed and extraordinarily damaging Anyone But Corbyn Coup last summer, but her response to the election result was actually pretty well considered:
"The Labour Party In Liverpool Wavertree is a vibrant, democratic organisation with around 1,800 members. Quite rightly, the members elect officers of the party to oversee its work. We are united in wanting to secure a new General Election and the return of a Labour government under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn as soon as possible. We had a great local result on June 8, with the Labour majority [in Wavertree] going up for the third election in a row and almost four in five people voting for Luciana Berger as the Labour candidate. That is thanks to the hard work of local members and a revitalised national party under Jeremy Corbyn. It is a fantastic foundation for the next General Election, whenever it comes."
It's absolutely clear that the local Labour Party and Luciana Berger have both expressed a desire to work together, and Berger was very clear about her respect for the democratic result, but right-wingers who hate internal Labour Party democracy and would rather the party be run as an ideologically pure neoliberal dictatorship are desperately trying to spin this resounding election result as some kind of evil plot by leftie bullies to take over the Labour Party.

The lengths that right-wingers will go to to defend their hatred of democracy are quite extraordinary. 


The Daily Mail writer Adam Crafton brazenly lied that Luciana Berger resigned from Corbyn's cabinet because of anti-Semitism in order to create a misleading sympathy narrative. But in reality her resignation letter was a ridiculous reality-reversing diatribe about how she had to ignore the will of the Labour Party membership and help launch a hugely damaging internal party civil war out of "loyalty" to the party and a desire to create party "unity"!

There was no mention of anti-Semitism in Berger's resignation letter whatever, meaning that the Daily Mail journalist was simply trying to create Labour Party divisions by inventing a total lie and trying to conflate the disgusting anti-Semitic abuse Berger has suffered from the extreme-right with the left of the Labour Party*.

Another right-winger to jump onto the concern trolling bandwagon was the Tory-loving slob Paul Staines (AKA Guido Fawkes), who invented a fictional threat from the Wavertree Executive Committee to "deselect" Luciana Berger, then cried crocodile tears about it as if he actually cares about the good of the Labour Party, rather than being the ridiculously biased pro-Tory muck-slinger that he actually is.

The comments beneath the Guido Fawkes article from his loyal hard-right hate mob are quite extraordinary, with one Tory fanatic claiming that the Tory spin machine failed during Theresa May's vanity election because they didn't smear Corbyn as a "left wing terrorist loving extremist" hard enough, rather than because of the appalling lack of Tory manifesto policies aimed at helping anyone apart from corporations and the mega-rich.

The right-wing of the Labour Party joined the Daily Mail and the most notorious right-wing blog in Britain in howling at the democratic result in Wavertree, and smearing the left of the party as "thugs" and "bullies" as if they'd taken over the executive committee of the local Wavertree party by force rather than by the ballot box.

Another Labour right-winger called Andrew Whiteside cried that the local party had been taken over by "communists" and then went on a spectacularly ironic Twitter blocking spree to eradicate all forms of dissent from his ideologically pure Twitter echo chamber!

The absurd thing of course is that right-wing Labour leaders like Neil Kinnock, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown spent years ideologically purging the Labour Party and parachuting loyal right-wingers (like Luciana Berger) into safe Labour seats, but the Progress mob had no complaints about thuggery or bullying then because they believed so strongly in the ideological purification of the Labour Party to make it a centre-right orthodox neoliberal party in line with their own agendas.

But suddenly when the left of the party is making a resurgence, not by force but by the ballot box, they're all suddenly shrieking and wailing about the nasty bullying lefties!

The hypocrisy of these Labour Party right-wingers isn't even the worst thing, it's the fact that they're queuing up to stand alongside the Daily Mail, the Daily Telegraph and the extreme-right Guido Fawkes blog to attack the democratic workings of their own party, and bitterly smear their fellow Labour Party members.


 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. You can have access to all of my work for free, or you can choose to make a small donation to help me keep writing. The choice is entirely yours.




OR

* = It's worth noting that one of the extreme-right thugs who was jailed for sending anti-Semitic abuse to Luciana Berger, is an obnoxious former Tory party member called Joshua Bonehill, also sent a load of abuse and threats to me back in 2014.

Wednesday, 24 May 2017

The sick new Tory propaganda tactic


Synthetic outrage is playing an ever more prominent role in right-wing political propaganda, and the latest displays of astoundingly hypocritical right-wing synthetic outrage in the wake of the Manchester Arena atrocity are the most sickening yet.

The tactic is to shout down anyone who tries to hold the Tory government to account with accusations that they're "exploiting dead children" by raising legitimate concerns about whether better government policy could have prevented the attack.

The worst case example





Loads of Tory sympathisers have been trying to shut down political debate by accusing anyone who holds the Tories to account of "political point scoring" but the sickest example of this revolting synthetic outrage tactic I've come across is this one (see image).

It happened after I posted an article detailing the seven years of severe cuts that the Tories have imposed on the armed forces, police, emergency services, hospitals and border force. You can read the article here and observe that it does not mention "dead children" (or any of the victims of the attack) one single time.
I even posted the article on Facebook with a status saying "Right-wing Tory sympathisers will inevitably react with synthetic outrage to this article because they believe that the Tories should never be held to account for their actions"


But one popped along anyway to accuse me of "exploiting dead kids" simply by providing some pertinent facts about the negligent Tory attitude towards public safety and security.

The brazen hypocrisy of this accusation is clear for all to see.

I didn't even mention dead kids at all. He did.

If anyone is exploiting dead kids for political purposes it's him for the way he invoked dead children to say "DON'T DARE QUESTION THE GOVERNMENT".

To use the disturbing thought of recently killed children for political purposes like this, and actually accuse the other person of exactly that behaviour is a truly sick display of hypocritical moral high-horsing.

remember: This Tory apologist was far from alone. There have been countless others using this synthetic outrage tactic to silence criticism of their beloved Tory government today. I just singled him out because his was by far the most sickeningly hypocritical.

So I say this. Don't let sick Tory propagandists use hypocritical displays of synthetic outrage to stop you from holding the Tory government to account.  They're trying to argue that if people die, then it's morally wrong to subject the ruling party in government to any kind of scrutiny.

If you see them doing it, expose them as the sick hypocrites they are.

The Murdoch empire

Instead of holding the Tory government to account over their savage cuts to the security forces, Rupert Murdoch's propaganda minions at The S*n have spent the last few days spreading lies and smears about Jeremy Corbyn so as to assist Theresa May back into power.

The S*n is clearly acting as direct political propaganda for the Tory party, and it's easy to see why.

The Tory manifesto is promising to sling the Leveson enquiry into press corruption in the bin, so that the right-wing press can carry on as if Murdoch's minions had never hacked into the telephone of a dead teenage girl.


We might well wonder where the Tory moral outrage is over what was done to Milly Dowler's family when Murdoch's minions hacked into her phone and made them hope she was still alive.

We might wonder at where the Tory moral outrage is that their beloved leader is promising to let Murdoch off the hook for Milly Dowler in return for total support in his main propaganda sheet.


It doesn't exist, because all of their outrage about dead children is purely synthetic, and turned on and off for political purposes.

These tribal Tory apologists are the kinds of people who would have lapped up the disgusting front page lies The S*n printed about the innocent Liverpool fans at Hillsborough

They're the kind of people who would have sneered at anyone who (rightly) said that the tragedy was caused by police negligence, not by drunken rowdy fans as the right-wing propaganda lies claimed. 

In fact they probably would have used synthetic outrage to accuse the dedicated Hillsborough Justice Campaigners of exploiting the dead football fans to score political points!

That's how depraved they are.


Conclusion

Tory propaganda tactics are sick. They're often developed in order to trigger people's strongest emotional reactions like fear, anger, hatred, repulsion and outrage.

This latest "exploiting dead children" tactic is one of the most revoltingly hypocritical things I've ever come across, because not only does it invoke dead children for the political purpose of stopping people from trying to hold the government to account, it's also astoundingly hypocritical for doing precisely the thing that it accuses their opponents of.

If we ask dare to question seven years of harsh Tory cuts to the armed forces and police, these sick Tory propagandists will strategically lob the agonising thought of the poor dead children in Manchester into the debate in a desperate attempt to shut us up.

That's how sick they are.


The Tories are absolutely desperate and they're going to fight dirty as fuck from now on, so brace yourselves for much more of it. If they'll lob thoughts of recently killed children into the debate in order to defend their beloved party from scrutiny, they'll say or do literally anything won't they?


 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. You can have access to all of my work for free, or you can choose to make a small donation to help me keep writing. The choice is entirely yours.




OR

Saturday, 15 April 2017

The S*n's attempted hatchet job on Richard Burgon is spectacularly idiotic


Let's start with a fact that everyone should know. The S*n is a despicable hard-right propaganda rag that nobody should read. They have no respect for the truth or basic human decency. If they decide to attack you for any reason, they will print lie after lie to smear you, even if you've just survived a horrific football stadium disaster at the hands of a negligent police force.

On evening after The S*n mocked a footballer with black ancestry by comparing him to a gorilla and attacked the city of Liverpool on the eve of the Hillsborough disaster, hacks at The S*n decided to turn their fire on the Labour MP and Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon.

The S*n's political editor Tom Newton Dunn attacked Burgon for supposedly joining "a heavy metal band that delights in Nazi symbols". Everything about the story is fact-averse nonsense.

Burgon hasn't joined the (not very famous) band Dream Troll, they're actually some of his old heavy metal mates from his teenage years in Leeds. He still knocks about with them now that he's an MP and they invited him to sing on one track for their latest album.

The band are not Nazi sympathisers in any way.


The cited "Nazi symbols" in the S*n article relate to Dream Troll's "We Sold Our Souls For Rock n' Troll" album cover.

It is so obviously a tribute to the legendary 1975 Black Sabbath album "We Sold Our Souls For Rock n' Roll" it's ridiculous. (judge for yourself).

Before they went to print The S*n hacks were sent a copy of the Black Sabbath album cover, but they denied that it was relevant to their story and published their misleading hatchet job regardless 


The S*n even got rentaquote Tory MP Charlie Elphicke to put his name to a load of sanctimonious drivel criticising Richard Burgon for hanging out with his old mates, calling it a "terrible misjudgement", accusing him of "sending the wrong message" and demanding that he "distance himself from this band as soon as possible".

That lot would be sanctimonious enough in its own right, but it comes from a guy who Tweeted furious condemnation of anti-fascist protesters, but said nothing to criticise the actual fascists they were opposing.

When picking a guy to condemn someone for his old mates' totally made-up fascist sympathies, it's probably best not to pick a guy who (like a lot of other Tories) is clearly a lot more sympathetic to extreme-right fanatics than those who oppose them.

A badge of honour



Burgon is a target for hacks at The S*n because he's one of the few
MPs who criticise the ruinous neoliberal economic dogma that
Rupert Murdoch and The S*n endlessly propagandise in favour of.
Anyone with any sense will know that Burgon and his old heavy metal mates have no extreme-right sympathies, and that the S*n story is a woefully misleading hatchet job that was still published despite the idiocy of it being pointed out to them before it went to print.

The problem is that an awful lot of idiots read hard-right propaganda rags* and allow themselves to be influenced by this kind of spiteful and ridiculously dishonest hatchet job.

Even if gullible people have been convinced into hating Richard Burgon by this smear-job, it's quite telling that this piss-weak fabricated nonsense is the best they can come up with to attack him.

If this embarrassingly lame rubbish is the worst they can sling at him, that just goes to show that he must be a pretty good guy that they couldn't find anything else.

Additionally, the fact that Burgon still knocks about with the mates he's known since he was a teenager, rather than going out on junkets with lobbyists and corporate executives 
in his spare time like a lot of other MPs do, is another quite strong indicator that he's a pretty decent bloke.

Burgon should see this embarrassingly lame fact-free character attack from bitter black-hearted hacks at The S*n as a real badge of honour. 


Burgon's response

Richard Burgon posted a response to the hatchet job on his Facebook page. Here's an extract.

"When The Sun hates you and what you stand for, they'll come at you. That's not right, but it's what The Sun does to people like me who have different views and principles to those of Rupert Murdoch, Kelvin MacKenzie and the rest of them.

But The Sun should leave my mates out of it. They are not politicians and they shouldn't have their lives intruded upon in this way. They are mates and they will always be my mates. In places like Leeds, we stick together.

The Sun doesn't get that. They'll make up stories about innocent people dying at Hillsborough and not care.

They'll attack trade unionists.

They'll attack police officers for getting a lunch break.

They'll attack immigrants and asylum seekers.

They'll attack people who are looking for work and people who can't work because they're ill.

Don't ever let The Sun become "The Voice of Britain" - because if it does, we will all become victims of the hate of those who run the show at The Sun." 

Boycott the S*n

On the 28th anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster it's worth reiterating that no true football fan would ever touch a copy of the S*n or be seen dead sharing links to their website on social media. How could anyone imagine that The S*n wouldn't have printed the same kind of disgusting lies if it had been their club that had lost 96 fans to appalling police negligence that day?

Even if you don't like football, there's still no excuse for supporting Rupert Murdoch's disgusting hard-right propaganda empire by actually paying money to read the utterly misleading bile he's intent on spoon feeding his readers, or giving him free publicity by sharing links to The S*n website.


 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. You can have access to all of my work for free, or you can choose to make a small donation to help me keep writing. The choice is entirely yours.


Monday, 26 May 2014

12 Things you should know about the 2014 European elections


In this article I'm going to highlight 12 talking points from the 2014 European elections. They're not really just 12 things, but lots and lots of different things organised under 12 subheadings.


The UKIP earthquake actually happened on Sunday

In their desperation for UKIP to win and create a big news story, the mainstream press declared the UKIP local election results an "earthquake" and a "triumph" even though the UKIP share of the local election vote actually fell dramatically from last year. UKIP won far fewer new council seats than Labour (who apparently were the big losers despite winning more than half of the seats on offer); they failed to gain control of a single council; and they finished with far fewer council seats than even the politically toxic Lib-Dems.

The mainstream press actually shot themselves in the foot on the Thursday night, because the UKIP "earthquake" headlines would have been far more profound had they saved them for Sunday night and Monday Morning, after it had become clear that UKIP had won the most votes in the European ballot and created a genuine shock to the system, rather than just picking up a few council seats scattered all across the country.


The press should have saved their superlatives for Sunday night, because that is when UKIP made history by winning the European ballot. It is the first time in living memory that a UK level election has been won by anyone other than Labour and the Tories, and it is the first time in the history of the Conservative party that they have failed to finish in the top two.

UKIP received the most votes by a significant margin, they won the most seats overall, they increased their share of the vote in every single region and they even took an MEP in Scotland, which is quite incredible given that their former party leader in Scotland recently insulted the Scottish people by describing them as "subsidy junkies" (this is especially insulting because every Scot with a Brain in his head should know that the UK takes far more out of Scotland than it gives back in "subsidies").

The only ray of hope from this UKIP "earthquake" can be found in the large discrepancy between UKIP local election vote and their vote in the European ballot. This discrepancy suggests that hundreds of thousands of people voted against UKIP in the local elections, but held their noses and voted for them in the European election in order to send a message to the establishment that they want the UK to withdraw from the EU.
 

Fascism is stalking Europe again

I have criticised UKIP a lot, because I strongly dislike their Uber-Thatcherite economic stance, their immigration fearmongering tactics, their lack of transparency over their policies, and the fact that they are bankrolled by a pack of former Tory party donors, however I've stopped short of ever branding UKIP a "fascist" or "racist" party, because I don't believe that this kind of melodramatic language is useful. They obviously attract a hell of lot of bigoted people, but they do tend to regularly sling the bigots out of the party when they get caught saying homophobic, racist or sexist things (which is a ridiculously common occurrence).

I won't stop short of using this kind of blunt language to criticise the extreme right Front National party in France.

These people, led by the disgusting Le Pen family, are fascists, racists and bigots. In the week before the election (the founder of the party, MEP candidate, and father of the current leader) Jean-Marie Le Pen suggested using the horrific Ebolavirus as a solution to Europe's "immigration problem". This unbelievable statement actually gave his party a boost in the poll ratings!

It is absolutely extraordinary that this bunch of disgusting far-right extremists have won a landslide election victory in a country as big, multicultural and generally centre-left as France. I hope all the non-extremist French people who didn't bother to vote feel thoroughly ashamed of themselves for letting these freakish extremists win the election and make their country look like a laughing stock of backwards, hate-filled nutters.

It's an illustration of how dangerous these Front National extremists are that after it became clear that they had won the European election in which only about a third of French people had bothered to vote, they immediately used this success as their justification to call for the French parliament to be dissolved!

I strongly dislike UKIP, but at least our anti-EU protest party in Britain is just an Uber-Thatcherite Trojan horse, in France the chosen anti-EU protest party are a disgusting bunch of fascists.

The victory for Front National in France wasn't the only example of extreme right parties on the rise. In Austria the neo-Nazi Freedom Party came second, the Hungarian extreme-right nationalist party Jobbik came second, and Geert Wilders extreme-right PVV came second in the Netherlands too. It is also possible to argue that the ruling PP party in Spain has shifted so far to the right that they should now be classified alongside the extreme-right fringe*.



The people of Britain have spoken

Before the election I did my best to use facts and evidence to explain to the public that UKIP is a Thatcherism on Steroids party pretending to be patriots in order to hoover up the anti-EU protest votes, to question their lack of clearly stated policies on several vital issues and to highlight their appalling voting record in Europe - so it was hardly a surprise to find my Another Angry Voice Facebook page filled with gloating Ukipper comments when the result of the European poll was released on Sunday 25th May.

One of these UKIP gloaters was so ignorant of what the election meant that he told me that "the majority of Britain has spoken" as if the majority of the country had gone out and voted for UKIP.

Even if we just count the people who actually bothered to vote, UKIP got 26.6% of the vote, which is nowhere near "the majority". However it's also got to be remembered that only 34% of people actually bothered to turn up to vote at all. UKIP might well have won, but they did so with the votes of just 9% of the eligible electorate. Only a Ukipper could be ignorant enough of how politics actually works to declare a 9% electoral mandate to be a clear "majority".

66% of the electorate didn't even bother to vote in this election, meaning that if the British people have spoken, they didn't say "I love UKIP" they said "I really, really don't give a fuck about this".


Labour did OK but they've only got themselves to blame

This result was hardly a glowing endorsement of the Labour party, but they did manage to significantly increase their share of the vote and win themselves seven extra seats. They now have 20 seats in the European parliament, which is one more than the Tories. This is a good performance when viewed in terms of the traditional Labour-Tory rivalry, given that in 2009 the Tories won twice as many seats as labour (26 to 13).

Even thought this is the best Labour performance in an European ballot for decades, they still finished second, a significant margin behind UKIP, but in my view they've only got themselves to blame for this.

Had Labour given the public the referendum on the EU they so clearly want and deserve, instead of adopting the anti-democratic "we won't let you vote because you'll vote the wrong way" stance, the UKIP thorn could have been drawn years ago.

By refusing to give the people the referendum they want, and furthermore signing up to the Lisbon Treaty without a referendum, Labour essentially turned the European elections into an impromptu referendum on the EU and allowed a more-Tory-than-the-Tories party to piggy back to electoral success on the back it.

The Labour party should never have allowed their commitment to the EU to over-ride the right of the UK public to self-determination, and the price they're going to continue paying for it, is that they've created a Frankenstein's monster of a protest party.

If Labour would have dealt with the EU issue in a democratic way by giving the public a referendum at some point during their 13 years in power, UKIP would have lost their raison d'etre, and perhaps the UK might have experienced the birth and rise of a genuine protest party that is fundamentally opposed to neoliberalism (as in Greece, Italy & Spain) rather than promoting the growth of a terrifying "Thatcherism on Steroids" party which is even more enthusiastic about the destructive ideology of neoliberalism than even the Tory establishment are.
       

The Liberal Democrat meltdown

The Liberal Democrats went into this election with eleven MEPs, they have come out of it with just one. If we look at the crude numbers, the shocking scale of the Lib-Dem carnage becomes absolutely clear.

  • In the North West their vote fell from 236,000 to 105,000, they lost their MEP and finished 5th behind the Greens.
  • In London their vote fell from 240,00 to 148,000, they lost their MEP and finished fifth behind the Greens.
  • In the North East their vote fell from 104,000 to just 36,000 and they lost their MEP.
  • In the East Midlands their vote fell from 221,000 to 108,000, they lost their MEP and finished behind the Greens.
This carnage was repeated across the country. The Greens jumped above them into fourth place (with a higher % of the vote and three times as many MEPs) and the Scottish National Party (who only stand candidates in one of the twelve regions) beat them too by returning two MEPs.
 

Nick Clegg has been destroying the party from within for four long years, but it's not him that is suffering, he's got another year of claiming his six figure ministerial salary, swanning around in ministerial cars and enjoying his smug sense of self-importance. The people who are suffering the consequences are outside the Westminster bubble. 10 Lib-Dem MEPs have lost their jobs, over 300 Lib-Dem councilors lost their seats a few days previously and prior to that, countless Lib-Dem activists have encountered a torrent of hostility as they knocked on doors and tried to drum up support for their imploding political party.

Just as Labour should take a long hard look at themselves over the rise of UKIP, the Liberal Democrats need to look at the causes of this massacre. Had the Lib-Dems been shrewd negotiators they could have turned the 2010 hung parliament to their advantage, but they displayed an abject lack of strategic thinking and utter contempt for large chunks of their own core demographics, so they are getting what they deserve.

The fact that the vast majority of the casualties are falling outside of Westminster has insulated Nick Clegg and his allies from the true scale of destruction, so it's conceivable that he might actually even be allowed to carry on driving the party into the ground until the next General Election.
  

A Thatcherite whitewash in England

For the purposes of this section I'm going to forget for a moment that the Labour party long ago gave up being a social democratic party in favour of presenting a sickly concoction of neoliberalism-lite and pseudo-socialist window dressing. I'm also going to have to forget that the one remaining Lib-Dem MEP represents a party dominated by Orange Book neoliberals too.

The Two devoutly Thatcherite parties absolutely hammered the opposition in every English region apart from London and the North East. Even regions that were devastated by Thatcherism in the 1980s have now returned a majority of devoutly Thatcherite MEPs.

Immesurabe damage was done to the Yorkshire economy when the Thatcher regime decided to abandon British heavy industry and manufacturing in favour of promoting the fantasy of the "post-industrial economy" built around the City of London financial sector.

The mining, steel and heavy manufacturing sectors were all deliberately repressed and left to ruin, leaving areas of Yorkshire blighted by high unemployment, poverty and crime to this day. Despite this appalling legacy of abuse inflicted on Yorkshire and her people by Thatcherites with their heads full of toxic neoliberal dogma, the people of Yorkshire have returned 4 Thatcherite MEPs (1 Tory, 3 UKIP) and just two from all of the other parties combined (2 Labour).

The story is similar in the North West, where Margaret Thatcher's neoliberal experiment hammered the region's industries and infrastructure. Recently declassified documents show how back in the early 1980s Margaret Thatcher wanted to completely abandon the city of Liverpool to post-industrial decay (neoliberal theory says just leave it to market forces, rather than the government intervening to reduce the scale of social devastation), but now the region has returned five Thatcherite MEPs, and just three from the opposition (all of them representing "neoliberalism-lite" New-Labour).

In England the final score is an absolute rout in favour of Thatcherism. Of the 60 MEPs representing English regions, 39 belong to the two overtly Thatcherite parties, whilst only 21 come from the other three parties combined.

If we accept the fact that New Labour and the Liberal Democrats are also adherents of the neoliberal orthodoxy, the score in England is Thatcherism 58 - Alternative parties 3.
  

Scotland is a very different country

The two devoutly Thatcherite parties routed the opposition in England, but they were minor parties feeding off scraps in Scotland. The Scottish National Party romped to victory ahead of Labour, with the Tories finishing a distant third and UKIP finishing an even more distant fourth.

Despite falling just short of bagging a third MEP at the expense of UKIP, the SNP result is a very good one indeed. They are after all the ruling party in the Scottish Parliament, and they've passed this mid-term election test with flying colours, beating the Tory and UKIP vote combined.

UKIP took just 10.2% of the Scottish vote, and UKIP and the Tories combined only managed to get 27.7% of the vote between them. Meanwhile in England the two Tory parties took significantly more than 50% of the vote between them.

The hugely different voting patterns between Scotland and England are demonstrated by the fact that the Tories and UKIP bagged 65% of the seats available in England, but in Scotland they were quite lucky to even sneak away with 33% of the seats.

It seems that four years of the most right-wing government in living memory hasn't been enough to ward the English away from voting for Thatcherite parties, and if I was a resident of Scotland, I'd much rather brave the uncertainty of independence and self-determination, than risk facing a Tory-UKIP coalition ruling over Scotland from down in London.

This resounding victory for Thatcherism south of the border should be a dire warning of what could be to come if the Scottish electorate refuse to take their opportunity to end London rule in September 2014. If the Scottish people dislike being ruled over by a London based Tory & Lib-Dem coalition they didn't vote for, they're going to be sick as hell if they end up with a Tory-UKIP government in 2015.
   

The North East

The mainstream press will no doubt harp on about how UKIP were soundly beaten in London, but one other region of England comprehensively rejected UKIP too. The North East is by far the smallest electoral region in England, returning just three MEPs, and the people of the North East returned two Labour party MEPs and one for UKIP.

I'm particularly pleased about this result for two reasons. I grew up at the very top end of North Yorkshire, which is actually far closer to Middlersbrough, Sunderland and Newcastle than it is to the big Yorkshire cities of Leeds and Sheffield. This means I (mis)spent a lot of my youth in County Durham and the North-East, and I feel almost as much a North-Easterner as a Yorkshireman as a consequence. It gives me a sense of pride that this small region - the one that has been hit hardest of all by 35 years of neoliberal ideology - hasn't  succumbed to the "blame the immigrants", "blame the EU", "blame multiculturalism" narratives that convinced the rest of the country to elect Thatcherism on steroids.

The other reason I'm pleased for the North East is that the second name on the Labour party list was Judith Kirton-Darling, someone I knew quite well during my childhood and teenage years. She is someone I've always had a great deal of admiration for, she is a decent and honest individual, and just the right kind of person to do what politicians should and serve the people who elected them, rather than their own self-interest. I'm sure that Judith will do everything in her power to drag the Labour party back towards the left, and back onto the course of actively promoting social justice. On a night of bitter disappointment for the progressive left, seeing that Judith had won a seat was perhaps the only genuine moment of delight for me.
   

The Green flop

The Green party presented a decent manifesto full of interesting and progressive polices, and they were hoping to cash in on all of the protest voters fleeing from the Liberal Democrat train wreck, but they didn't do anywhere near as well as they should have done.

On the positive side they increased their number of MEPs from 2 to 3 and finished as the fourth party thanks to the astonishing collapse in Lib-Dem support, however their share of the vote flat-lined in most of the regions, and the Scottish Greens fell some way short of beating UKIP to the sixth seat in Scotland.

In my view the explanation for this flop was the fact that Caroline Lucas stepped down as party leader in order to concentrate on her job as MP for Brighton (in which she has done a fantastic job). Her replacement Natalie Bennett just doesn't have the charisma or infectious enthusiasm that Caroline Lucas has, and I think that's she is putting a lot of people off voting for the party.

It seems harsh to say that Natalie Bennett has been a failure after such a short time in the job, but the numbers speak for themselves. The Green party should have been picking up protest votes from the Lib-Dems in regions where the Lib-Dem vote imploded, but they flat-lined, even falling back a bit in several regions. They didn't finish ahead of the Lib-Dems by their own virtues, but rather by the fact that the Lib-Dems nosedived past them.

The Green party needs a strong charismatic leader to reach out to the public (and they also need to do something drastic with their social media strategy). Natalie Bennett should seriously consider stepping down for the good of the party after this disappointing flop.

   

At least some people in Europe are awake

Of the 73 UK seats in the European parliament, only seven will be occupied by politicians that belong to parties that can be seen as anything resembling an alternative to ideological neoliberalism (3 Green, 2 SNP, 1 Plaid Cymru and 1 Sinn Fein). It is quite remarkable that the protest party that has emerged in the UK is even more devoted to the Thatcherite ideology of neoliberalism than the three Westminster establishment parties that have been enforcing this destructive right-wing economic ideology for 35 long years.

Elsewhere on the continent the public aren't quite as politically illiterate as the English (who voted heavily in favour of UKIP when taken as a whole, when the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Irish didn't), many of whom are so gullible that they've let the right-wing press convince them that the EU is a communist organisation rather than the neoliberal shitshop it actually is**.

The most high profile alternative party is the anti-neoliberal coalition Syriza in Greece, who have gone from being a motley bunch of "lefties" that were the 5th party in Greece with just 1 MEP in 2009, rose to become the official opposition in the Greek parliament in 2012, and now they've romped home in first place in the European election to bag six MEPs.

The resistance to the neoliberal orthodoxy also showed in Spain, where the two traditional parties saw their share of the vote slump by 40% as a range of smaller parties took lots of votes and seats. The Spanish United Left finished third and took six seats, whilst another, brand new, left-wing party called Podemos (We Can) took 8% of the vote to finish in fourth and bag five seats, despite having been founded in March 2014. To go from nothing to the 4th biggest party in Spain in just over two months is an absolutely incredible achievement.

In Italy the ruling centre-left party scored a resounding victory with over 40% of the vote and bagged 31 seats. Beppe Grillo's 5 Star anti-establishment party romped into second place with 17 seats at their first effort in a European election. These successes left Silvio Berlusconi's party miles behind in third place and the extreme-right Legia Nord down in fourth place with just five seats.

The left and centre-left also performed strongly in Denmark where they took the majority of the seats, the anti-capitalist Die Linke party increased their share of the vote in Germany and the Cypriot Communist party took two of the island's six seats.

The UK public might well be a bunch of Turkeys voting for Christmas, but at least elsewhere on the continent a few people are waking up and voting for genuinely alternative parties. There is actually very little in common between 5 Star in Italy, Syriza in Greece, Podemos in Spain and the Cypriot Communists, but at least they're actually genuine alternatives to the right-wing economic ideology of neoliberalism that has ruled over Europe and most of the individual nation states for the last two decades, rather than a party that believes the only problem is that we haven't had enough neoliberal ideology yet, like UKIP.
  

A vote of no confidence in the government

The two parties that make up the coalition government went into the European election with 37 MEPs, which were won with 40.3% of the vote in 2009. Back in 2009 the Tories were by far the biggest party with as many MEPs as Labour and UKIP combined, and the Lib-Dems were the fourth party with 11 seats, just two behind Labour and UKIP with 13 each.

After the 2014 vote the two Coalition government parties have lost 17 seats between them, to bring their total down to just 20 of the 73 seats. Their combined share of the vote fell to 30.8%, meaning that the parties have dropped some 1.5 million voters between them.

Considering that 64% of people didn't even bother to vote, and less than a third of those who did bother, actually voted in favour of the two ruling parties, we're left with the astonishing statistic that these two parties only managed to win backing from 11% of the electorate between them.

If we see this election in terms of an approval test for the government, they failed spectacularly, because they didn't even manage to convince one in nine people to come out and vote for them.

There is no other way to view this but as a vote of no confidence in the government.
   

Bye bye Nick Griffin

After such depressing results for anyone who is opposed to the economic ideology of neoliberalsim that has ruled over us from Westminster and Brussels for decades, it is probably important that I try to end this political autopsy on a high note, which is the annihilation of the BNP.

The North West may have returned a majority of Thatcherite MEPs, however at least they rid themselves of the embarrassment of having BNP leader Nick Griffin as one of their European representatives after his share of the vote collapsed from 8% to below 2%.

My home region of Yorkshire also rid themselves of their BNP representative after an even more dramatic decline in their share of the vote from 9.8% down to just 1.6%.

We can all have our suspicions about where the majority of the BNP vote evaporated to, especially given disgraced former Tory MP turned UKIP bigwig Neil Hamilton's claims that UKIP attracts "decent" BNP voters, and Nick Griffins accusations that "they [UKIP] are using all of our rhetoric, they are using our slogans, they are recycling our posters and people like it".

Even though their vote seems to have been stolen by another right wing party, it's still good to see the BNP get pretty much wiped off the map as a political force.


 Another Angry Voice  is a not-for-profit page which generates absolutely no revenue from advertising and accepts no money from corporate or political interests. The only source of revenue for  Another Angry Voice  is the  PayPal  donations box (which can be found in the right hand column, fairly near the top of the page). If you could afford to make a donation to help keep this site going, it would be massively appreciated.
* = The ruling PP party in Spain have introduced draconian new laws to criminalise peaceful public protest, attacked womens' rights, and enforced "austerity" with absolute glee, whilst bailing out their corrupt banker mates ever more egregiously.

** = What kind of communist organisation would have an independent central bank led by a former Goldman Sachs employee that goes around forcing privatisation all over the place?

More articles from
 ANOTHER ANGRY VOICE 

Saturday, 24 May 2014

A different look at the 2014 local election results


Some of the mainstream media reactions to the local election results have been quite extraordinary. The same narratives have been repeated in the pages of countless newspapers and on nearly every television station. I'm just going to run through a few of these narratives and expose them for the counter-factual gibberish they are.

Labour did really badly

Labour did not do badly, they made net gains of over 330 council seats to bag more than half of all of the council seats up for election. They made a net gain of five councils, and Labour party gains also resulted in the Tories losing several councils to No Overall Control.

The media has painted these results as a disaster for Labour, but they gained almost three times as many new seats as the UKIP "earthquake" and they took complete control of
Amber Valley, Bradford, Cambridge, Crawley, Croydon, Harrow and Merton.

As regular readers know, I'm not a fan of New Labour, but you don't have to be a fan of theirs to see the astonishing levels of media bias necessary to paint the party that made by far the biggest gains as the losers.

UKIP caused an earthquake

UKIP did not cause an earthquake. In reality they won far fewer seats than even the politically toxic Liberal Democrats managed. They did manage to pick up over 160 new council seats, but they were scattered far and wide across the country, meaning that they gained control of precisely zero councils. The only way any of the UKIP councilors will get any taste of political power is if they form coalitions with the Tories in some of the Tory dominated No Overall Control councils. And even then, they'll be the minor player in any coalition, meaning experienced Tory councilors are likely to use these new UKIP councilors as convenient human shit deflectors just as the Westminster Tories have used the hapless Liberal Democrats for the last four years.

The really clear indicator that this was no UKIP earthquake was the fact that their share of the vote actually declined dramatically from the local council elections last year (from 22% down to 17%), and this decline happened despite the council elections coinciding with the Euro elections, which should have brought out lots of extra UKIP voters.

Only London rejected UKIP

The Guardian used some very crude statistics to print a ludicrous story claiming that the only area of the country that rejected UKIP was London. They compared the pro-UKIP vote in London (7%) with the aggregated average for the entire rest of the country (about 20%), as if the rest of the country is some kind of homogenous blob. The narrative of the story being that London is an enlightened city full of educated, cultured and well-informed people, whilst the rest of the country is inhabited by backwards, uneducated UKIP voting yokels. It's hardly surprising that the London based Guardian would come up with a narrative that is so contemptuous of the rest of the country, but the actual facts paint a very different picture.

A quick look at the results illustrate how UKIP were comprehensively rejected in major towns and cities across parts of the country.

North West
Out of the 243 council seats up for grabs in Manchester, Liverpool and Preston, UKIP won Zero.
North East
Out of the 219 council seats up for grabs in Newcastle, Sunderland and Gateshead, UKIP won zero.
Midlands
Out of the 224 council seats up for grabs in Birmingham, Coventry and Wolverhampton, UKIP won one single seat.
Yorkshire
Out of the 242 sets up for grabs in Leeds, Sheffield and Hull, UKIP won just four seats (three of them in Sheffield).
Another way that we can demonstrate how the Guardian's crude use of statistics is completely counter-factual is through comparison of UKIP support in some specific London boroughs with UKIP support in some of the aforementioned cities.

There were more UKIP councilors elected in each of three single London boroughs than in the combined cities of Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle, and Leeds (combined population 2.6 million).*

Despite having a population of just 232,000 the London Borough of Bexley elected three UKIP councilors. Bromley (population 310,00) elected two UKIP councilors and Havering (238,000) returned seven UKIP councilors.

As it turns out, there are boroughs of London that are far more keen on UKIP than some of the former industrial cities of the North East, North West, Yorkshire and the Midlands, but why would the London centric media let facts get in the way of a good story about the divide between smart and savvy Londoners and the disgusting uneducated yokels in the rest of the country?

UKIP are as much a threat to Labour as they are to the Tories

This narrative is particularly insidious. It is absolutely clear that the UKIP appeal is much stronger in the traditional Tory heartlands than it is in Labour strongholds. The strongest indicator of this is the big decline in UKIP support since the 2013 local elections (almost all Tory councils) and the 2014 elections (about two thirds Labour councils).

If UKIP were equally threatening in Labour councils, one would have expected a sharp rise in the UKIP vote this year because of the draw of the Euro elections, however the UKIP share of the vote actually slumped dramatically.

As mentioned above, UKIP utterly failed to make any inroads at all in big Labour cities, returning absolutely zero councilors in Manchester, Liverpool, Birmingham, Newcastle or Leeds.

The media have pointed at Rotherham, (where UKIP now have 10 councilors) as their evidence that UKIP are on the rise in Labour areas, but it's the only example they can find.

It would be easy to feel a bit ashamed of my fellow Yorkshiremen for having been duped into voting for the "Thatcherism on steroids" party, especially after all the damage Thatcher and her cronies inflicted on South Yorkshire industry, however Rotherham is a very special case.

What makes Rotherham such a special case is the extraordinary story that hit the national news headlines in late 2012, when someone on the Labour dominated council decided to use the fact that they were UKIP supporters as part of the justification for removing two children from their foster family. This story propelled Rotherham into the national headlines and gave UKIP an enormous profile boost in the town. It's easy to understand how UKIP managed to win a few people over with their "plucky underdog" narratives when everyone in Rotherham knows all about somebody on the Labour council unilaterally declaring UKIP an extremist organisation.

All UKIP candidates had to do in order to win sympathy was to appear reasonably normal and say "Look at me, I'm not an extremist am I? The Labour council are bullies, you should side with the underdog not the bully" and boom, they picked up 16% of the council seats.

The real story in Rotherham isn't UKIP at all. It's actually the question of where the hell are the Tories and Lib-Dems? Rotherham has been controlled by Labour for 80 years and the Labour council has become hopelessly complacent, but the public of Rotherham have overwhelmingly rejected the Tories and Lib Dems in favour of sending the council a clear message of protest by voting for UKIP.

The facts speak for themselves, UKIP have done far more damage to the Tories than they have to Labour, yet the mainstream press seem determined to talk up the UKIP threat to Labour too, as if it's somehow comparable. I imagine they're doing it because they simply want it to be true, because the evidence clearly shows that the Tories are the ones that should be running scared, not Labour.

The Greens are irrelevant

The mainstream press didn't actually present this claim explicitly, but it was clear that they ware saying it by omission. The Greens didn't win as many new seats as UKIP, but they fielded nowhere near as many candidates, and their campaign wasn't funded by a rogues gallery of wealthy former Tory party donors either.

The Green party leads Brighton council already, are they are now the official opposition in Liverpool, Norwich and Solihull. They also have the only non-Labour councilor in both Islington and Lewisham.

It's hardly an earth shattering performance, but their gains are surely worthy of some small footnote at least, rather than lumping them in with "other" and completely ignoring them as so many news outlets have done.

Lets not talk about the Tories eh?


In order to spin the narrative that Labour were the big losers (despite gaining well over 300 seats) the press had to talk down the big losses suffered by the Tories.

The Tories lost control of 12 councils, suffered a net loss of over 170 seats, and found themselves edged out of the possibility of re-forming coalitions in several of the No Overall Control councils too.

Swathes of the mainstream media has been far too busy criticising Ed Miliband's poor leadership and Labour's supposed failure to apparently even notice that the Tories did so badly.

The Lib-Dems are toast

The Liberal Democrats' suffered heavy losses, and their days of hoovering up protest votes are clearly over, but they have managed to protect five of the six Lib-Dem councils they were defending.

If gaining an extra 300 seats to take more than half of the total council seats up for election was some kind of disaster for Labour, losing over 300 seats (over 40% of the seats they were defending) is hardly a roaring success for the Lib Dems, but they managed to keep control of their strongholds in Sutton, Cheltnham, Eastleigh, South Lakeland and Watford.

The huge Lib Dem losses were suffered in areas where they were the protest vote and in some of the big northern cities. Liverpool is a particularly shocking example. B
etween 1998 and 2010 the Lib-Dems outright controlled Liverpool council, now they only have three councilors left, meaning the Green party have now become the official opposition to Labour. In Manchester they suffered a complete wipeout, despite having been the official opposition with a decent 34 councilors as recently as 2010.**

The Lib-Dems are never going to be able to con left-wing voters into believing that they are slightly to the left of New Labour again, but they do still maintain a few Lib-Dem strongholds, meaning that the electoral wipeout so many betrayed Lib-Dem voters would love to see in 2015 is never going to happen.

Conclusion

Don't believe everything you read in the newspapers!
  
 

 Another Angry Voice  is a not-for-profit page which generates absolutely no revenue from advertising and accepts no money from corporate or political interests. The only source of revenue for  Another Angry Voice  is the  PayPal  donations box (which can be found in the right hand column, fairly near the top of the page). If you could afford to make a donation to help keep this site going, it would be massively appreciated.

 * I realise that this is an incomplete data set (as pointed out in the comments) but I'd rather be guilty of using a big but incomplete data set to undermine an argument extrapolated from a single crude statistic, than to be guilty of using a blatant assumption to make an accusation of bad faith (as the guy who was complaining did when he called me a Labour supporter). Assumptions make the foundations of very weak arguments - I am not a Labour supporter.

**I had to amend the article slightly because I somehow managed to get the results in Manchester and Liverpool confused by claiming the Lib-Dem wipeout happened in Liverpool by mistake. Maybe as a Yorkshireman, I should avoid writing about Lancashire issues from now on if I've managed to get my Mancs and Scousers all mixed up?

More articles from
 ANOTHER ANGRY VOICE 
     
Reasons to vote alternative 
     
The AAV Euro election scorecard

                 
 The mainstream media oligopoly
        
Why 73% of UKIP supporters should actually vote Green