Showing posts with label David Blunkett. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Blunkett. Show all posts

Saturday, 13 August 2016

What is Labour Tomorrow?


A group of Blairite figures have set up a company called Labour Tomorrow. It was Incorporated by Nicola Murphy on April 1st 2016, which was a good few months before the Anyone But Corbyn coup was launched. It soon appointed David Blunkett and his fellow unelected House of Lords peer Brenda Dean.

All three of the senior figures behind this Labour Tomorrow project are Blairites. David Blunkett was a Blair loyalist who served in various cabinet positions under Blair, including Home Secretary. Brenda Dean was also a minister in Tony Blair's government between 1997 and 2005. Nicola Murphy is the wife of the Blairite MP and former caretaker shadow chancellor Chris Leslie.*

The Labour Tomorrow website claims that it's some kind of fundraising organisation to support centre-left activities like political blogs, smart campaigns, policy development and debate. The only blog post on the website was written by Blunkett and Dean. After having a few predictable digs at Jeremy Corbyn the article states that the organisation has "already raised funds which will be deployed to back projects in policy development, digital media, campaigning and building activist networks".

This focus on digital media is interesting. It's absolutely clear that the right-wing Blairite faction of the Labour Party are taking a hammering on social media. Back in the 1990s their efforts to carefully stage manage the news agenda were highly successful (Alistair Campbell didn't earn his reputation for being the master of the dark arts of political spin for nothing) but in the social media age these old tactics are inept, if not entirely counter-productive.

These days the news agenda can't be carefully orchestrated by drip-feeding stories to the mainstream press because pesky independent bloggers and social media activists like me keep coming along to rip their narratives apart. Social media isn't yet powerful enough to entirely counter-balance the mainstream media propaganda machine, but as time moves on more and more people are abandoning daily newspapers and seeking information on their smartphones instead. This trend towards diversified news content providers (including independent blogs, voluntary organisations and all kinds of other websites) is making it increasingly impossible for political parties to control the parameters of political debate by drip-feeding propaganda to their mates in the mainstream media echo chamber.

It looks an awful lot like this Labour Tomorrow organisation has been set up in order to shower cash on Blairite approved blogs, social media pages and protest groups in order to create a fake grassroots movement in favour of Blairite centre-right Thatcherism-lite slop in order to try to counter the genuine grassroots movement inspired by Jeremy Corbyn's election as Labour leader.

This kind of fake grassroots campaigning is hardly a new development, in fact it's been going on for years and has even acquired the nickname "astroturfing".



Some people might suggest that it's a conspiracy theory to suggest that Labour Tomorrow could be intent on creating fake social media movements and the like in order to create the illusion that their outdated Blairite ideology is still popular, but the evidence of their attitude is clear from a quick look at their Twitter page.

The Labour Tomorrow Twitter account hasn't posted a single tweet and is only following six accounts (including those of the Blairite thinktank Progress and the Blairite riddled Fabian Society). Despite having posted no content, this account nas somehow amassed over 2,000 followers.

This discrepancy between the lack of content and follows and the significant number of followers is enough to raise the suspicions of anyone who actually understands the basics of how Twitter works.

A look through the accounts following the Labour Tomorrow 
page make it absolutely clear that it is followed by an army of fake spambot accounts, most of which have been set up in the last week and generally have fewer than 10 followers of their own.

The tiny majority of real people following the Labour Tomorrow account actually seem to be Jeremy Corbyn supporters keeping an eye on it to see what it eventually does!

A look through their contributions  of some of the 2,000 odd spambot accounts reveal the exact same retweets over and over and over again.

One of the most commonly retweeted articles by the Labour Tomorrow spambot army is an advert for a company selling chewy sweets in the shape of penises. It seems that whenever Labour Tomorrow kicks into life, their spambot army is going to switch seamlessly from hawking edible cocks to hawking even less palatable Blairite propaganda!

The problem with buying likes from clickfarms is that it only creates a veneer of popularity. One hundred spambot accounts that retweet your content to their tiny audiences of half a dozen or so other accounts is absolutely worthless in comparison to one real person who shares your content with their real audience of real friends, family, work colleagues, neighbours etc.

The fact that Labour Tomorrow have gone in for the same kind of paid-like spambot tactics as disgusting extreme right groups just goes to show how far behind the curve they are on social media. They're so out of touch with recent developments in the political landscape that that they think that social media success is something that can just be bought for cash from some clickfarm in the middle east, rather than something that develops organically because real people like and share the real content provided by real people.

If they're just going to waste the funds they've raised (from as yet unnamed sources) on idiocy like paying spambot clickfarms to follow their Twitter account, the Labour Tomorrow astroturfing campaign looks set to be no threat to anyone.


 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. You can have access to all of my work for free, or you can choose to make a small donation to help me keep writing. The choice is entirely yours.


Sunday, 24 July 2016

David Blunkett's tunnel vision comments about the middle classes


When it became clear that Jeremy Corbyn wasn't just going to be bullied into resignation the coup-plotters had to come up with some kind of plan to rig the Labour leadership election against him. Their first move was to exclude over 130,000 legitimate members of the party from voting by retroactively setting an arbitrary six month cut off (a move that infuriated the people who had been excluded and anyone who cares about party democracy too). Their next move was even worse. They decided to allow a backdoor to allow the well-to-do to sign up to vote for a £25 surcharge.

The aim was clearly to exclude as many Corbyn supporters as possible by pricing them out of participation. The ploy failed spectacularly when an unprecedented 183,000 people in just two days (most of the Corbyn supporters) paid the £25 levy, with many of them sacrificing essentials in order to cough up the Labour Party surcharge on democratic participation.

Labour coup-supporters have never really tried to understand the massive surge of people joining the Labour Party since Jeremy Corbyn became leader. Instead of seeing 300,000+ new party members as potential footsoldiers in a paradigm shifting grassroots Labour Party campaign, a lot of New Labour types are terrified of them and prefer to use insults and slurs to dismiss them. We've all seen examples of coup-supporters using the word "Corbynite" as an insult and dismissing the 300,000+ new party members as "infiltrators", "dogs", "Trots", "entryists", "thugs", "quasi-Marxists"...

One of the common themes amongst coup-supporters is the idea that Corbyn supporters are "middle class" and so comfortably well off that they are out of touch with reality.

The former New Labour Home Secretary David Blunkett is the latest coup-supporter to try this hopelessly divisive line of attack. He described Corbyn supporters as being a bunch of "middle class" people who have "captured" the Labour Party and are "protected from the consequences of their actions" and "whose whole life and raison d’ĂȘtre is opposition".

It's hard to see how Blunkett could have been any more smug and insulting if he'd tried.

Firstly, the most obvious point is that sticking a £25 surcharge on democratic participation is a clear demonstration that the Labour Party establishment don't want the working poor and the vulnerable to have a political voice. They rigged the election in favour of the well-to-do who can find a spare £25 just to cast a single vote, and now they have the absolute cheek to whinge about middle class people getting involved in the Labour Party!

The next obvious criticism is that the "middle class" are nowhere near as insulated from the consequences of their actions as smug New Labour MPs who have been parachuted into safe Labour-voting constituencies and essentially have jobs for life no matter how much they serve the interests of capital over the interests of the people who elected them. Even if they do somehow lose their seat in the House of Commons they can look forward to retirement in the £300 per day (tax-free) unelected House of Lords, or cushy consultancies at PR firms or corporations hoping to cash in on their political connections. The people who are really behaving like they have no regard for the consequences of their actions are the Labour Party coup-plotter MPs and their tunnel-vision suffering supporters within the Labour Party.

Another point is that using "middle class" as if it's a pejorative term is absolutely appalling. One of the core propaganda tactics utilised by coup-plotters and their cheerleaders in the mainstream press is that Jeremy Corbyn doesn't have what it tales to win over Tory voters*, but how on earth are Labour going to do that if party grandees go around dismissing the middle class as cluelessly out-of-touch people who should keep their noses out of the Labour Party?

Yet another point is that not all middle class people are comfortably well off because lots of middle class demographics have suffered the consequences of six years of wage repression and socially and economically ruinous Tory ideological austerity. Even if some middle class people are still doing quite well despite six years of Tory austerity and wage repression, it's highly likely they have kids or family relatives in the younger generations who have been loaded up with obscene tuition fee debts just for having a bit of aspiration, who have been priced out of the housing market, who have been denied social security based solely upon their age, or have been exploited on Zero Hours Contracts or as a free source of Labour under Tory "Workfare" forced unpaid labour schemes.

The idea that the 300,000+ new Labour members are just a bunch of interfering middle-class do-gooders is insulting to pretty much everyone. It's an insult to our intelligence to say that people who are furious about policies that were either introduced by New Labour (university tuition aspiration taxes, speculation induced house price inflation, Zero Hours Contracts, Workfare forced-labour schemes) or catastrophically unopposed by the Miliband brand of New Labour (ruinous Tory austerity, cuts to in-work benefits) are just being petulantly middle class and should just get over themselves and vote for the reincarnation of New Labour rather than a guy who has a consistent track record of actually opposing this appalling stuff.

Blunketts comments, like those of so many coup supporters before him, just go to prove that it's not Corbyn supporters (middle class or otherwise) who are out of touch with reality, it's New Labour politicians who are so insulated within the Westminster bubble of wealth and privilege that they're incapable of understanding that the unprecedented groundswell of support for Jeremy Corbyn (despite a vicious mainstream media propaganda war against him) is that people are utterly sick of the pampered Westminster establishment club, of which they are a part. 


 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. You can have access to all of my work for free, or you can choose to make a small donation to help me keep writing. The choice is entirely yours.




OR

* Tory voters constituted 24% of the electorate in 2015. Their all time low was 19% at the 2001 General Election. This suggests that only 5% worth of Tory voters would ever swing to Labour under any circumstance. Conversely the Lib-Dems jettisoned two thirds of their supporters when they chose to enable the Tories back into power (some 9% of the total electorate) and 35% of the electorate didn't even bother to vote. It's clearly a very confused strategy to chase away your own voters by trying to appeal to Tory voters when 44% of the electorate are disillusioned with the Lib-Dems or politics in general and looking for an alternative worth voting for.

Sunday, 26 July 2015

Scrap the leadership election - Have the Blairites gone completely crackers?


In my last article about the Labour Party leadership contest I concluded by noting that every time Labour right-wingers like Tony Blair, John McTernan, Chuka Umunna, David Blunkett and the three other leadership contenders spout their extraordinary anti-Corbyn rhetoric, they're actually helping him by boosting his public profile. 


Just like the way that the bigoted antics of so many Ukipper fruitcakes has kept UKIP firmly in the headlines, the more hyperbolic fuss the Labour right-wingers make about Jeremy Corbyn, the higher his public profile becomes.

Judging by his lunatic assertion that the unelected interim Labour leader Harriet Harman should cancel the leadership contest because the wrong candidate might win, it's pretty safe to assume that the Labour MP John Mann is not a follower of my work, nor smart enough to figure out for himself the self-defeating nature of his ludicrous suggestion.

52,000 people have joined the Labour Party since the General Election in May and the Another Angry Voice Facebook page has been flooded with comments from people stating that they've joined/rejoined the Labour Party in order to back Jeremy Corbyn. However this surge of new members is not being welcomed by the Blairite rump of the Labour Party at all.

After the Scottish independence referendum the SNP gleefully celebrated a huge rise in party membership which made them the third biggest political party in the entire UK; before the General Election the Green Party were delighted with the rise in membership they called "the Green Surge"; after their catastrophic General Election performance the Liberal Democrats took some solace in the surge of new membership; but the Labour Party seem to have a completely different attitude to this big surge in interest in Labour politics: Instead of welcoming and engaging with their new members, people like John Mann openly resent them, and even describe them as "infiltrators"!

Any other party would be delighted to have picked up 52,000 new members and counting in just ten weeks, but the Labour old guard are not. It seems that they'd rather stick with the failed austerity-lite rubbish that ruined their chances in the last election and set about driving all the new members back out of the party, rather than let Labour Party members choose the proper straight-talking left-winger they'd like to see given a chance to prove himself.


Of course the decision to allow anyone who was prepared to pay £3 to become a registered supporter and have a vote in the Labour leadership contest was a very silly idea from the beginning, however once the terms of the leadership contest have been decided, and some 17,000 people have already paid their £3, it would be insanity for the Labour Party top brass to suddenly scrap the contest because they're afraid that Jeremy Corbyn might win.

Just imagine the reaction if John Mann got his wish and the leadership contest were to be abandoned. There would be an awful lot of discontent within the party about the decision, and Corbyn's public profile would get another huge boost as "the man the Labour leadership are so terrified of they scrapped their leadershipelection rather than have him win".

Even if the Labour leadership found some way of ensuring that Corbyn couldn't win the revised leadership contest, what legitimacy would the new leader have when it is obvious to all (including very many Labour Party members) that this other candidate only managed to get the job because the rules were redrawn to prevent Jeremy Corbyn from winning?

 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. You can have access to all of my work for free, or you can choose to make a small donation to help me keep writing. The choice is entirely yours.






MORE ARTICLES FROM
 ANOTHER ANGRY VOICE 
                 
The Blairite attacks on Jeremy Corbyn
                                       
Labour vs the Lib-Dems in the strategic ineptitude stakes
                
Ukippers say the funniest things
                         
George Osborne has created more debt than every Labour government in history combined
                        
How Ed Balls' austerity-lite agenda ruined Labour's election chances
           
The Tory ideological mission
                     
How the Lib-Dems were just as compassionless as the Tories
                                
Margaret Thatcher's toxic neoliberal legacies