Tuesday, 9 February 2021

Andrew Neil's anti-woke "cancel culture" hypocrisy

The right-wing dinosaur Andrew Neil, who infamously spread deadly AIDS misinformation into the 1990s and let his mate Boris Johnson get away with absolutely trashing any pretence at BBC impartiality by dodging the partisan grilling he administered to every other party leader in the 2019 election, has completely given the game away about how the right-wing corporate media operates.

He's busy launching a new news channel called GB News, which will operate as another propaganda vehicle for hard-right billionaires; a kind of Fox News for Britain intent on pushing as many right-wing figures and propaganda talking points into the national political discourse as possible.

Neil has repeatedly described how this new channel is going to be "anti-woke", and many people have pointed out to him that since "woke" is defined as:

1. Well informed

2. Alert to injustice in society, especially racism

The logical conclusion is that his new propaganda venture on behalf of Rupert Murdoch is going to ensure that their audience are not well informed, and not alert to injustice and racism.

Neil's comeback to this argument is absolutely telling. He has openly declared on Twitter that "the original definition of woke is out of date" and that it now means a form of cancel culture that seeks to "close down ideas and people with which it disagrees".

The interesting thing about this claimed fundamental change in the fundamental meaning of "woke" comes when we think about who has orchestrated this complete redefinition of the term.

Anyone who cares about the meaning and origins of words will know that the term "woke" originates from the African-American vernacular English to "stay woke", which means staying awake to issues like injustice and systemic racism.

The mainstream media, especially in Britain, have deliberately changed this meaning to turn it into a pejorative term they use to sneer at any left-wing or socially progressive cause, not just anti-racism, feminism, but LGBT rights, environmental campaigns, and basically anything concerned with combating injustice.

So we've got black people in the United States developing a specific term to describe the important aspect of their lives that is to do with maintaining awareness of injustice, racism, and systemic persecution ... and then we've got wealthy, white, right-wing polemicists like Andrew Neil declaring that the original black meaning of the term is defunct and incorrect, and that it now refers to a form of "cancel culture" which seeks to silence and erase people and ideas with which it disagrees.

Once we consider the origins of the term, the hypocrisy of Andrew Neil cancelling the original meaning and replacing it with a pejorative redefinition becomes absolutely obvious.

By deliberately redefining the term to mean something else, and declaring the original meaning cancelled, Andrew Neil and his ilk are guilty of exactly the kind of fanatical "cancel culture" extremism they accuse others of.

They're seeking to cancel the proper meaning and silence the black voices who use the term in its original and intended way, in order to overwrite it with a new and deeply pejorative definition.

If anyone is engaging in "cancel culture" it's Andrew Neil, who is so obsessed with opposing those who seek to keep people informed about injustice and racism, that he's deliberately redefining their vocabulary to make it an insulting caricature of its proper and original meaning.

How much more "cancel culture" can you get than cancelling the meaning of words to replace them with your own insulting redefinition?

This blunder from Neil goes further than mere hypocrisy though, it gives the game away about the Orwellian language-redefining tactics that right-wing propagandists have been using for decades.

Take the way terms like "socialism" and "capitalism" are used across the corporate media.

The actual meaning of "socialism" is a specific kind of economic organisation in which public infrastructure and services are publicly owned. The more communal ownership there is in a society, the more socialist it is.

But if you read the Murdoch propaganda rags, or any of the other corporate media, "socialism" is given an absurd caricature meaning, like 'spending other people's money', or 'handouts to the idle'.

It doesn't help their cause to apply the proper meaning of socialism, because the vast majority of people tend to agree that things like health, education, emergency services, water, energy, and transport should indeed be run as not-for-profit public services, so they invent their own pejorative meaning to make it look silly and ridiculous instead.

The same happens in reverse. They know perfectly well that "capitalism" refers to a specific form of economic organisation in which private interests control the infrastructure and services in order to extract as many unearned profits for themselves as possible.

But they continually refer to "capitalism" as if it's a mere synonym for "trade", or "doing business" as if private profiteering is the only conceivable form of economic organisation. 

It's conducive to their interests that people don't consider the inherently exploitative nature of capitalist profit extraction, and instead see capitalism as the only conceivable form of doing trade.

If capitalism is defined in this ridiculously broad way, it makes anyone opposing it seem like a deranged lunatic who wants humanity to descend to bartering for rabbit skins in caves, and that's exactly how the right-wing corporate media propagandists want it.

They continually and deliberately redefine words and phrases with new meanings that are more conducive to their own capitalist interests.

When there's an economic alternative to their favoured system, they redefine it to make it seem ludicrous.

When their favoured economic system comes under critique they give it such a generous new meaning that it would seem that only a maniac would oppose it.

And when black people create a new term to describe the ongoing process of staying alert to racism and injustice, they seek to erase it completely, and overwrite it with a pejorative new description.

So when Andrew Neil posts a Tweet chastising someone for using the original and intended meaning of "woke", and insists that his Orwellian caricature of the meaning is now the only accepted meaning, he's not just being an absolute hypocrite by engaging in the very "cancel culture" tactics he decries, he's completely giving the game away about the insidious right-wing corporate media tactic of continually redefining the fundamental meaning of language in order to make it more conducive to the radically right-wing capitalist agenda that they're paid to promote.


 Another Angry Voice  is a "Pay As You Feel" website. Access to my online writing will always remain free. If you see some value in what I do, please consider supporting my work with a small donation/subscription.



OR

7 comments:

Mighty Drunken said...

Good to see you post.

I came to the conclusion a year ago (longer?) that political debate across political divides is almost impossible.
When you use terms like; woke, capitalism, socialism they mean different things to different groups. So you will immediately start arguing across purposes and never came to an understanding.
This has being going on forever. Socialism and capitalism are made of many different components, some of which can be swapped in and out or varied. The words are too "big" and have too many different meanings.

I think a political philosopher needs to break these terms down in a particularly clever way so it is taught to everyone. So in the future we are able to discuss different political philosophies with each other.

Jason Matthews said...

"When their favoured economic system comes under critique they give it such a generous new meaning that it would seem that only a maniac would oppose it"

this made me think of MMT:

https://sovereignmoney.site/modern-money-theory-revisited

Spell Home said...

My husband changed dramatically towards me, doesn’t communicate anymore.He disrespects me and accuses me falsely of infidelity because of wicked gossip …but I’m simply AMAZED at the results of Dr. Ogudugu who did reunion love spell for me. Everything is going so well and EXACTLY how he said it would be. Even though it took 3 days to fully progress, it was so worth it because things are just about at perfection! How he took my situation and completely turned it around to give me exactly what I wanted is beyond me, but something I will never question and just be completely grateful, God Bless Dr.Ogudugu for turning sorrow into happiness. Dr.Ogudugu contact; greatogudugu@gmail.com/WhatsApp +2348063739701

Mr. Magoo said...

I have never read a better example of the pot calling the kettle black! Andrew Neal may be a right-wing dinosaur, but you are a left-wing dinosaur. Real socialists have had to put up with Lenin and his disciples changing the meanings of the words "capitalism" and "socialism" for decades, but now we have to put up with reformists doing the same.

Capital is wealth that is invested into production/distribution in order to make more wealth. Therefore capital comes from (and can only come from) profit. Alas, capitalism is a global economic system obsessed with accumulating more & more & more profit.

When the coal mines were nationalised - a elderly woman went to one of them with a bucket to collect some free coal. The manager was tickled by this and asked to buy the coal from a shop. The purpose of that anecdote is to highlight the mistake left-wingers make: that WE are the state. States have always and will always represent class divided societies. State owned enterprises are just as committed to making profits as private enterprises. Nationalisation = state run capitalism.

Socialism is an international society in which the means of life (e.g. land; factories; railways) are commonly owned with the intention of producing/distributing wealth (i.e. useful things) to meet people's needs in harmony with nature.

https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/publications/education/

https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/pamphlet/socialist-principles-explained/

https://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/pamphlet/socialism-practical-alternative/


Unknown said...

You're both wrong . The original term was awake ie people awake to the corruption and deception in their govt and media . This was turned into woke , highjacked by the globalists for their controlled opposition .



JF said...

Good to see you posting again. Could we see more? I know you have been concentrating on other areas but i much prefer your blog. I dont agree with you on everything, in fact i often strongly disagree, but its always well worth reading.

Flyus Travels said...

I am very happy to read this content, Find the cheap flights tickets from Flyustravels
Direct flights from Delhi to USA
SFO to Vancouver flights
Non stop flights from USA to India